Thursday, May 01, 2008

Supreme Court update

Normally Indianz.com is hopelessly one-sided, but every now and again they produce some decent articles.

This article has a good recap of the Texas case that has recently gone to the Supreme Court.

Despite the success, tribes have faced numerous challenges, mainly from states that objected to gaming. While most have relented -- notably Florida and Oklahoma -- there are a handful that still won't agree to negotiate with tribes.

Texas remains the largest of these holdouts. The state has successfully blocked the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe and the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, also known as the Tigua Tribe, from engaging in any form of gaming on their reservations.

A third tribe, meanwhile, is limited to Class II games like bingo and electronic bingo machines. The Kickapoo Tribe believes it is entitled to additional types of gaming but the state refuses to negotiate a Class III compact.
So Texas is just saying no. This has held up the Kickapoo tribe for years - I think we're going on 10. It will be interesting to see if this holds up in the Supreme Court. So far, lower court rulings have said that states cannot be forced to enter into a compact.A provision in IGRA allows the Interior Department to step in when a state won't come to the table. The Bush administration issued Class III secretarial procedures in hopes of resolving the issue for the Kickapoos.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, however, rejected the move. Last August, the court ruled that Secretary Dirk Kempthorne overstepped his bounds by cutting the state out of the process.

The court also invalidated the provision of IGRA that authorized Interior to step in. By a 2-1 vote, the judges said Texas was never found to be in "bad faith" as required by the law.

"The Secretary may not decide the state's good faith; may not require or name a mediator; and may not pull out of thin air the compact provisions that he is empowered to enforce," Chief Judge Edith H. Jones, a Reagan appointee, wrote in the 42-page opinion. "To infer from this limited authority that the Secretary was implicitly delegated the ability to promulgate a wholesale substitute for the judicial process amounts to logical alchemy."
The fact is, that resistance by the state, region, or town presents significant problems. That is why the Mashpee Wampanoag were so determined to sign an agreement with Middleboro host a casino. Unfortunately for the town, we folded too quickly and sold ourselves cheap. In the end it may not matter since Massachusetts has given every indication that it does not want casinos and wants Indian casinos even less. That combined with the strong regional opposition will make things difficult for the tribe, cause years of delay(or complete defeat), and add up to millions of dollars in lost revenue for the backers.

3 comments:

Matt's Mom and Dad said...

Thank you for your frequent updates regarding anything that may affect the outcome of the proposed Middleboro Casino. We look forward to the day when we can finally say, "Mission accomplished." However, we realize that the legal process is lengthy and we must be patient. Still we remain optimistic.

What is most impressive to us is that you have kept your end of the debate issue oriented and have not succombed to the unfortunate devices employed by some pro-casino supporters. We continue our support and encouragement for your clean efforts. As always it is a pleasure to read your blog posts.

Fiferstone said...

Bumpkin, I'm reading the tribe's application for land-into-trust in depth (BIG fun) and I am astounded at the logical tautologies contained within it, and also at the (to my mind at least) essential items omitted. One component that is absent (completely) is a demonstration of the need for the resort-casino facility, in the summary of the application, there is a notation under this section [no documents at this time]. Can't wait to see what other unique treasures I uncover in the course of my reading, and I ferverently hope that the recent upheaval in BIA leadership, the uniqueness of the double-barreled two-plots-of-land-for-the-price-of-one-shameless-reservation-shopping approach, and the staunch opposition by people within Middleboro, and in the surrounding communities, all conspire to cause the BIA to reject this application for the shameless travesty that it is.

Anonymous said...

Please do not think our Town leadership or lack of it, is no-longer making closed door deals.

On 5-13 at MHS is a meeting with articles disguised in sheeps clothing.

Article 31; The Fretis property Article is like paying someone to take care of their home and property using taxpayer dollars.

Article 30; Why do we need the Gibbs property? Could we the taxpayers be purchasing land for the casino project?

Article 41;
Didn't the July 28th voted state the tribe was paying for the $600k for this pumping project? Where is this money? Let the tribe, not the taxpayor assume this debt.


Article 14 through 16 are to expedite any permitting our Town planner needs, and will allow the taking of properties.

We have $950,000 for a new ladder truck, where the base price starts at $1.3MM.

And the best ones are the land purchases to protect open space?

Duh......Last year we auctioned land to make up for budget problems, yet this year we have a pot of gold and need to purchase land???

Nothing good will come from most of these articles, and I urge ALL residents concerned about the community attend this meeting.